Author: CraigE

  • Maryanne Wolf: Helping Families Build Children’s Reading Brains

    Maryanne Wolf: Helping Families Build Children’s Reading Brains

    By Joanie Harmon

    Neuroscientist and director of UCLA Center for Dyslexia, Diverse Learners and Social Justice collaborates on international resources for families, pediatricians, and educators.

    July 9, 2020

    Maryanne Wolf says that when she was in the second grade, she was “always in trouble for talking much too much.” 

    “I wrote about this in “Proust and the Squid,” my first book,” says Professor Wolf, who directs the Center for Dyslexia, Diverse Learners and Social Justice at UCLA. “I went to a two-room schoolhouse [that] had four grades in each room. By the second grade, I must have tested the patience of a saint. I was not the only second grader who already learned whatever the fourth grade was being taught, but I was the only one who talked incessantly about it. Everything was so interesting!”

    “Sister Rose Margaret … threw up her hands because of me. And then suddenly, the back of my little classroom was flooded by books. I later learned that my sainted teacher went to my parents, who were by no means rich, and told them that they had a problem that could be solved if she could ‘put me on books’. From second grade on, I had my own Great Books program. I read every book that had to do with saints, heroes, everything about science – I’ll never forget the book, “All About Stars”! 

    “Books changed my life as a child,” notes Wolf. “I became every single heroine, villain, explorer I read about.  I believe I would never have become a scholar without my experiences with those great books. In fact, their wonderful mix of literature and science may well have been the roots of my work today on the science of words.”

    Wolf, whose research is focused on cognitive neuroscience, the reading brain, language, and dyslexia, is currently working on a way to ensure that other children everywhere can have that access to reading, regardless of the pandemic’s limited access to schools and libraries or students’ level of reading proficiency. 

    In collaboration with an international cadre of scholars, experts, and educators, Wolf has lent her expertise to the Haskins Global Literacy Hub, a project of the Haskins Laboratories at Yale University. Since the Resource Library was launched on May 25, it has been viewed by more than 6,500 people, and 1,800 resources have been viewed.

    The site provides high-quality, evidence-based resources, organized by preliteracy and literacy skills from infancy and preschool to Grade 12 students. The Hub’s website is free of charge and available to parents, educators, and medical practitioners. In addition, the resources include activities for parents of young children, multisensory reading instruction; RESCUE for Educators and for Families (Reading Slide from Covid-19: Undoing the Effect); a technology-based literacy intervention for real Cote d’Ivoire; and activities that address reading for children with hearing loss. The goals are both to mitigate the learning regression of many children during the pandemic, and also to create over time a global literacy hub of resources that can be used wherever there are insufficient resources and nonliterate children. 

    Professor Wolf is the author of the critically acclaimed and best-selling “Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain” (Harper Collins with 15 translations), “Tales of Literacy for the 21st Century: The Literary Agenda” (Oxford University Press), and over 160 scientific publications. Her latest book, “Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World,” was published in 2018 and is already translated in 11 languages. Wolf lectures around the world, including multiple presentations on global literacy for disenfranchised children at the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Sciences.

    Before arriving at UCLA in 2018, Wolf was the John DiBiaggio Professor of Citizenship and Public Service at Tufts University, and the Director of the Center for Reading and Language Development in the Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development. She is affiliated with the Dyslexia Center in the UCSF Medical School and with Curious Learning: A Global Literacy Initiative, which she co-founded. She is also the Chapman University Presidential Fellow where she is working to create GLIA (Global Literacy in Action) in which students volunteer to teach literacy in local underprivileged schools and potentially in Curious Learning deployments in Africa and India.

    Professor Wolf is the recipient of multiple research and teaching honors, including the Fulbright Fellowship, the American Psychological Association Teaching Award, a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study for the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford, the NICHD Innovative Research Award, and the highest awards by the Dyslexia Foundation, the International Dyslexia Association and the Australian Learning Disabilities Association. 

    Laura Rhinehart (’11, M.Ed.; ’19, Ph.D.) is the Assistant Researcher for the UCLA Center for Dyslexia, Diverse Learners and Social Justice. Photo by Dylan Pierce

    Ampersand discussed the aims of the Haskins Global Literacy Hub with Wolf, who is now a  Professor in Residence at the UCLA School of Education & Information Studies, and with Assistant Researcher Laura Rhinehart (’11, M.Ed.; ’19, Ph.D), on how families, pediatricians, and educators can assess and improve reading development in order to develop children’s academic achievement, personal success, and human empathy.

    Ampersand: What inspired the Haskins Global Literacy Hub?

    Maryanne Wolf: The framework for the global literacy efforts began before the pandemic, but the creation of a curated Resource Library for parents and educators in the US began directly in response to it.   A group of us, feeling paralyzed by our inability to help while we’re sheltered in place, began getting our fellow scholars across the the country together: a group of reading scholars and neuroscientists who are working with Yale’s Haskins Laboratory to form a hub of resources for parents across the country. We are coordinating and collecting and making available resources [for] infancy through adolescence.

    For example, Reach Out and Read, an organization for pediatricians is one of the resources for early childhood. By giving out free, developmentally appropriate books at every well-visit, their mission is  to raise awareness in parents about how important it is for children to hear language, to see books, and to make an association between tenderness and affection and the reading of books. 

    My fellow scholar from Toronto, Maureen Lovett, who is one of our best reading intervention scholars, and I built a basic “literacy organizer” of skills for every level of reading, beginning  with literacy precursors from 0-5 , and then moving to  early readers, developing readers, and finally advanced readers. Our whole group then began connecting  all the skills in  the literacy organizer  with links to multiple, research-based  activities that can help the child practice and work on these skills in the home.  Ken Pugh, the Haskins Lab Director, brought together a small group of technologically astute experts and people with PhDs or postdocs to curate these activities and to add more. 

    Within two days of its launch, 2,000 people began using this Resource Library. Since it was launched on May 25, I can’t even believe it was possible to pull this together within seven weeks of work. But by no means are we finished. This is our first iteration. We wanted to get it out because so many parents and educators are bombarded with options without knowing what’s good, what’s not good, and what has any evidence or  proof behind it.

    What we wanted to do is not so much give our imprimatur. Rather we want to let parents know ‘We know how hard this is for you. Here are some things that will help  your child keep learning during this hard period and  that have been proven to be of help to others.’ 

    What we have now is a growing, evolving group of activities that are free and online.  A lot of them aren’t ordinarily free, but we got permission  from publishers and researchers to be free through the pandemic, and if possible, to the end of the year. Whenever possible, the activities are based on research that we know or that comes from projects we respect. One of the effects that is emerging is that parents are increasing their knowledge of what’s important in reading development. We are fighting the regression in children’s learning, and increasing a parent’s understanding of just how complex reading is. 

    &: How does the Haskins Global Literacy Hub draw on the experience of scholars, experts, and practitioners worldwide to serve a diverse array of reading needs?

    Wolf: Laura’s been extraordinary in giving it to some pivotal people not only in Los Angeles, but other parts of the country.  The Haskins Lab involved major groups and schools for learning disabilities, the AIM Institute for Learning and Research, Windward School, Meadow School,  Atlanta Speech School, and The Southport School. These are major players in the world of reading and learning disabilities, and they are all contributing, particularly in helping us reach children of color and families who need these resources most.  The Cox Campus through the Atlanta Speech School has helped us present Town Halls for parents and educators on literacy and child adversity with the pediatrician and epidemiologist Renee Boynton-Jarrett. Dr. Boynton-Jarrett’s discussion of the effect of racism and inequity on learning was one of the best descriptions I have heard. 

    Another resource in dissemination comes from our Northern neighbors. I am an advisor to the Canadian Children’s Literacy Foundation, which focuses on bringing literacy to underprivileged children and indigenous peoples. They are exploring grassroot methods for reaching families in remote communities. They are sharing some of their strategies that may be of particular help to us, especially with our own less privileged communities and Native American populations, and we are sharing our resources with them. 

    Laura and I are also involved in work for local and state teachers during this time. As part of the California state literacy team, we’re building a series of three webinars that will be available to teachers – and parents – about how reading needs to be understood in new ways by our teachers.

    Laura Rhinehart: I’m also working with Dr. Sai Iyer, one of the pediatricians at UCLA and she’s created a screener for four-year-olds, to test their school readiness in terms of literacy. She thinks that pediatricians have a really important role in catching the children [with reading challenges] in preschool. I’ve been working to validate it with LAUSD in different preschool programs that got put on hold when schools were closed.

    Essentially, you show them a storybook and you ask them some questions about the letters and have them play around with the words and the sounds a little bit. She wants to do this during a well-child visit to be able to refer parents if their child is not school-ready at that point. All children go to these well- child visits, and so that way, she can catch students before they show up in kindergarten. We know that first year is so important, and those first couple of weeks and months. So, we’re making sure that they’re ready to hit the ground running in kindergarten. 

    &: What has been the response?

    Rhinehart: We have [interventions] for infants to high school students, all along the development of reading and literacy. All these resources have been vetted. I think even [information] that I’ve seen that has been sent by good resources are not necessarily vetted and as high quality as the things in the Haskins Labs. That’s really important for parents. 

    As Maryanne was mentioning, a lot of parents aren’t lucky enough to get a pediatrician that has been trained in Reach Out and Read. But these resources are on Haskins.

    &: Maryanne, one of the ultimate goals of reading as you have delineated in your work throughout, is empathy. How can reading for all help society with all the issues we have coming to the fore with twin pandemics of racism and coronavirus?

    Wolf: In February, Dean Marcelo and Carola Suarez-Orozco, Louis Gomez, and John Rogers from GSE&IS and I participated in a Vatican meeting on a new conceptualization of education. Pope Francis spoke to us about trying to change how the world thinks about education. He has recently been quoted as saying, ‘If education doesn’t listen, it doesn’t educate.’ It has struck me how important it is that we [develop] a culture of listening to each other: of teachers listening to the children and the children listening to other viewpoints.

    One of the most important things that reading does at its best is give us access to the perspective of another. I will never forget a quote from the novelist Jane Smiley, who was asked if reading would go away as we know it, and if the novel would disappear. 

    She said in paraphrase, “No, no – it won’t disappear, but the problem is it will be sidelined. And if it is sidelined, people won’t be able to enter the thoughts and feelings of others and then we could be led by leaders who do not read, who do not know the feelings of others, and that is a recipe for the loss in a democracy of multiple voices.”

    There are whole organizations, especially in England, called Reader Organizations. And all they do is read to children and to adolescents and to the elderly and to prisoners, so that through their voices, the beauty and the ideas contained with their chosen books can help another person leave themselves behind for just that moment and understand something  –or someone–that exists outside of themselves.

    One of the most important parts of being on this earth is to learn how to live with others. For me reading represents one of the best vehicles we possess to understand and to communicate with others. Proust said this better – that reading is, “that fertile miracle of communication that takes place without ever leaving our room.” 

    And that’s what I believe so much of reading is. It’s living communication, it’s passing over into the lives and perspectives of others. The two most important aspects of what I call deep reading – and deep reading is an evolving entity – are empathy and critical analysis. Being able to discern the truth value of what we read is the foundation for building ever more knowledge. Being able to pass over into another’s thoughts and feelings is the foundation for developing empathy and compassion for people we’ll never meet, but are all part of our connected world.

    One of the great tragedies of our present time is that we are led by a non-reader. If we become a nation of basically non-critical, superficial, shallow skimming non-readers, we have no chance to build the base of empathy, critical analysis, and rigorous knowledge that is imperative for our next generation. The stakes are much higher than most of us realize. There is a direct line between deep literacy and democracy. We have to build and strengthen that connection, one child at a time.  We have no time to lose in this moment of double pandemics, which ultimately is why the Haskins Global Literacy Resource Library came into being. 

    Visit this link for a recent Cox Campus Town Hall conversation between Professor Wolf and Dr. Reneé Boynton-Jarrett on the role of relationships in forming safety, trust, and brains built for learning, thinking, questioning and leading.

    To view Professor Wolf’s Resource Library on the Haskins Global Literacy Hub website, visit this link.

    To learn more about the Haskins Global Literacy Hub, visit the website

    Photo by Ron Searcey

  • Maryanne Wolf: Building Deep Reading Skills in a Digital World

    Maryanne Wolf: Building Deep Reading Skills in a Digital World

    By Joanie Harmon

    Op-ed for The Guardian states need for balance between the printed word and digital media.

    August 27, 2020

    Maryanne Wolf, director of the Center for Dyslexia, Diverse Learners and Social Justice at UCLA, has published an op-ed in The Guardian on the impact on children’s brains from reading on digital devices. The author of “Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World,” she states the importance of developing a biliterate brain – adapted to reading both digital and print – in order to navigate the new normal of remote schooling.

    “The process of learning to read changes our brain, but so does what we read, how we read and on what we read (print, e-reader, phone, laptop),” writes Wolf. “This is especially important in our new reality, when many people are tethered to multiple screens at any given moment.” 

    Wolf notes that skimming diminishes the process of deep reading, and cites the digital culture as continually putting attention spans at risk with constant distractions.

    “Deep reading is our species’ bridge to insight and novel thought,” Wolf writes in The Guardian. “These processes include connecting background knowledge to new information, making analogies, drawing inferences, examining truth value, passing over into the perspectives of others (expanding empathy and knowledge), and integrating everything into critical analysis. 

    “By contrast, when we skim, we literally, physiologically, don’t have time to think. Or feel,” she states.

    Wolf writes that research has shown declines in student comprehension when reading solely on screens, despite the illusion of speed over understanding. 

    “The digital elephant in every classroom and home is whether our youth will develop full literacy, if learning largely on skim-encouraging screens,” Wolf says. “More than 80% of college educators see a ‘shallowing’ effect by screens on their students’ reading comprehension, according to forthcoming research by Naomi Baron. Tami Katzir and Mirit Barzillai found similar perceptions and results in Israeli fifth and sixth graders. Even three-year-olds appear less able to deal with more abstract material when listening to stories on screens versus books.”

    In her op-ed, Wolf delineates the challenge to use both digital and print mediums to their advantage, without shortchanging young readers. Describing her current work with the Haskins Global Literacy Hub at Yale, which provides parents and educators with free, high-quality materials to build childrens’ reading skills, she says that systematic, evidence-based approaches are needed to develop foundational reading. Wolf also calls for balance in digestion of both the printed word and digital media.

    “As a society we must ensure that there are always books next to our children’s digital devices,” she writes. “Whether the books are new or old, owned or borrowed from the library, doesn’t matter. What matters is that they are there, and that children are encouraged to read them. Furthermore, books – not digital devices – should be the only reading option in children’s bedrooms.

    “Books are the places where we can suspend reality and instead explore our imagination’s more tolerable, more beautiful promise of possibility. We can do this.”

    To read, “Screen-based online learning will change kids’ brains. Are we ready for that?” by Maryanne Wolf, visit The Guardian website.

    Photo by Ron Searcey

  • Maryanne Wolf Elected to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences

    Maryanne Wolf Elected to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences

    By Joanie Harmon

    Scholar of literacy and the brain recognized by the Vatican for her work on applying science to education.

    October 1, 2020

    UCLA Professor-in-Residence Maryanne Wolf has been elected a permanent member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, a body of 80 scientists from around the world. Wolf, who founded and directs the UCLA Center for Dyslexia, Diverse Learners, and Social Justice, is a renowned scholar of literacy and neuroscience. With this appointment, the Vatican recognizes her work in applying science to education, in tandem with Pope Francis’ expressed goal of utilizing science to improve the lives of the world’s impoverished populations, particularly children. 

    Professor Wolf is one of a very few women who are members of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, and one of only several Academicians directly applying neuroscience to global issues in education. 

    “Our increased understanding of the reading brain has allowed us to provide new approaches not only to the global literacy crisis, but also to the local ones that go neglected till crises like our twin pandemics expose them for what they are: Impediments to the full intellectual, economic, social-emotional potential of every child,” Wolf states. “Literacy should be understood not only as a basic human right, but as our best vehicle for developing deep literacy and its sequelae–critical thinking and empathy, the cornerstones of democracy.”

    Prior to arriving at UCLA, Wolf was the John DiBiaggio Professor of Citizenship and Public Service at Tufts University, and the director of the Center for Reading and Language Development in the Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development. She is affiliated with the Dyslexia Center in the UC San Francisco Medical School and with Curious Learning: A Global Literacy Initiative, which she co-founded. Professor Wolf is the 2018-2020 Presidential Fellow in Education at Chapman University.

    Wolf took part in the Falling Walls Conference, an international meeting of scientists from a wide range of fields, held on Nov. 9, 2019 in Berlin. At the conference, which celebrated the 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, she highlighted the need both to develop global literacy as a basic human right and simultaneously to understand the changes to the reading brain in the digital environment. 

    Professor Wolf is the recipient of multiple research and teaching honors, including the Fulbright Fellowship, the American Psychological Association Teaching Award, a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study for the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford, the NICHD Innovative Research Award, and the highest awards by the International Dyslexia Association, the Reading League, the Australian Learning Disabilities Association, and the Dyslexia Foundation’s Einstein Award. Most recently, Wolf received the Walter Ong Award for her work on the impact of different mediums on the intellectual development of the species. 

    Wolf, whose research is focused on cognitive neuroscience, the reading brain, language, and dyslexia, is currently working on multiple ways to ensure that children everywhere can have access to reading resources, regardless of the pandemic’s limited access to schools and libraries or students’ level of reading proficiency. In collaboration with an international cadre of scholars, experts, and educators, Professor Wolf and Laura Rhinehart, UCLA research assistant, provide their expertise to the Haskins Global Literacy Hub, a project of the Haskins Laboratories at Yale University. 

    At the state and local levels, Wolf worked with Assemblyman Richard Bloom (D-Santa Monica) and Chip Robertson to create a new bill on Neurodiversity and Learning, in which she and Sue Sears, professor of education at California State University, Northridge, direct a collaborative between the UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies and the CSU’s colleges of education at their Southern California campuses. The collaborative is creating new models for introducing the science of reading into the formation of teachers. In related areas, Wolf and Rhinehart are working with the leaders of Los Angeles United School District on literacy development and assessment research through a grant from the Office of Special Education. Wolf is also a member of the California State Literacy Team, the Canadian Children’s Literacy Foundation, and the Stanford Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences Board. 

    Wolf’s most recent book is “Reader Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World,” published by HarperCollins, which delineates the need to develop a biliterate reading brain, with competencies in both print and digital mediums. She is the author of the critically acclaimed and best-selling “Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain” (HarperCollins), “Tales of Literacy for the 21st Century: The Literary Agenda,” (Oxford University Press), and over 170 scientific publications. 

    Professor Wolf lectures around the world, including multiple presentations on global literacy for disenfranchised children for the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, of which former GSEIS Wasserman Dean Marcelo Suarez-Orozco is a member. 

    Professor Wolf will take part in the next meeting of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on October 5-7, “Science and Survival,” which will be dedicated to international research on COVID-19 and the response needed in a global community. PAS Academician Frances Collins will discuss the opportunities for science’s contribution in the United States to this crisis. 

    In the program introducing the meeting, Pope Francis writes,“The crisis has shown us that especially in times of need, we depend on our solidarity with others. In a new way, it is inviting us to place our lives at the service of others. It should make us aware of global injustice and wake us up to the cry of the poor and of our gravely diseased planet.” 

    Photo by Ron Searcey

  • UCLA Center for Critical Internet Inquiry receives $2.9M Award  to launch Minderoo Initiative on Technology and Power

    UCLA Center for Critical Internet Inquiry receives $2.9M Award to launch Minderoo Initiative on Technology and Power

    [vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][nectar_highlighted_text color_type=”regular” highlight_color=”#5fdee5″ style=”full_text”]

    Minderoo Initiative on Technology and Power

    [/nectar_highlighted_text][vc_column_text]


    The UCLA Center for Critical Internet Inquiry has been selected by Minderoo Foundation as one of several recipients to participate in an international network of scholars committed to challenging the unjust impact of digital technologies on society through research, education, and the arts.


    The selection includes an award of $2.9 million to launch Minderoo Initiative on Technology and Power at the UCLA Center for Critical Internet Inquiry. The new funding will nurture a hub of research at UCLA exploring the  intersection of technology, power, and society and activating paradigm and culture-shifting work. The initiative will be led by the Center’s Co-Directors and Co-Founders, Dr. Safiya Umoja Noble and Dr. Sarah T. Roberts.

    /read the full announcement

     

    [/vc_column_text]

    [/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”2/3″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_video link=”https://vimeo.com/446363344/2e5798edf1″][/vc_column][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/3″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”]
    [/vc_column][/vc_row]

  • Joint Civil Society Statement: Interventions to Mitigate the Racially Discriminatory Impacts of Emerging Tech

    [vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][nectar_highlighted_text color_type=”regular” style=”full_text”]

    Joint Civil Society Statement

    [/nectar_highlighted_text][vc_column_text]

    Structural intervention is required to mitigate the racially discriminatory impacts of emerging digital technologies including AI

    July 15, 2020

    [This work was led by UN Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and Faculty Director of the Promise Institute for Human Rights at UCLA School of Law Professor E. Tendayi Achiume.]

    As widespread recent protests have highlighted, racial inequality remains an urgent and devastating issue around the world, and this is as true in the context of technology as it is everywhere else. In fact, it may be more so, as algorithmic technologies based on big data are deployed at previously unimaginable scale, reproducing the discriminatory systems that build and govern them.

    The undersigned organizations welcome the publication of the report “Racial discrimination and emerging digital technologies: a human rights analysis,” by Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, E. Tendayi Achiume, and wish to underscore the importance and timeliness of a number of the recommendations made therein:

    1. Technologies that have had or will have significant racially discriminatory impacts should be banned outright.
      While incremental regulatory approaches may be appropriate in some contexts, where a technology is demonstrably likely to cause racially discriminatory harm, it should not be deployed until that harm can be prevented. Moreover, certain technologies may always have disparate racial impacts, no matter how much their accuracy can be improved. In the present moment, racially discriminatory technologies include facial and affect recognition technology and so-called predictive analytics. We support Special Rapporteur Achiume’s call for mandatory human rights impact assessments as a prerequisite for the adoption of new technologies. We also believe that where such assessments reveal that a technology has a high likelihood of deleterious racially disparate impacts, states should prevent its use through a ban or moratorium. We join the Special Rapporteur in welcoming recent municipal bans, for example, on the use of facial recognition technology, and encourage national governments to adopt similar policies.  Correspondingly, we reiterate our support for states’ imposition of an immediate moratorium on the trade and use of privately developed surveillance tools until such time as states enact appropriate safeguards, and congratulate Special Rapporteur Achiume on joining that call.
    2. Gender mainstreaming and representation along racial, national and other intersecting identities requires radical improvement at all levels of the tech sector.
      The structural racism and discrimination that the report identifies as endemic to the field of technology (just as it is in many if not all facets of societies around the globe) cannot be remedied if the teams conceiving of, building, and promoting technological solutions do not understand and represent the concerns of those who will be impacted by them. When implemented, these demographic changes must be meaningful: past “diversity” and “inclusivity” efforts in the industry have often been mere tokenizations of underrepresented groups. Meaningful improvement will mean significant changes to industry power structures, funding flows and models, cultural changes in the workplace, and reevaluation of existing and future product lines that may be employed to target racially marginalized communities and other vulnerable populations.[1]
    3. Technologists cannot solve political, social, and economic problems without the input of domain experts and those personally impacted.
      The past several decades have been dominated by “techno-chauvinism,” the idea that technology alone can solve social problems.[2] But as Special Rapporteur Achiume rightly notes, no algorithmic model, no matter how “perfect,” will solve for centuries of inequality. For this reason, tech design and development must include domain experts (including those with first-hand experience alongside those with professional or academic expertise) in a consequential way. Such experts cannot be briefly consulted late in a product’s development, or worse, after its negative impacts are already being felt, but integrated into the design process. Furthermore, they must be compensated for their contributions. This is especially important in sensitive sectors such as education, criminal justice, and social services, where past technologies have been adopted in spite of flaws and biases that were facially apparent to experts in the respective field. Moreover, such experts can help to identify how well-meaning technologies may be distorted or misused in practice, exacerbating social inequities and harms rather than actually addressing community needs.
    4. Access to technology is as urgent an issue of racial discrimination as inequity in the design of technologies themselves.
      Digital divides illustrate the intersectionality of discrimination in technology, and the COVID-19 pandemic has thrown them into sharp relief. The global South lags the global North in the digital infrastructure that can be employed to provide remote access to medical care, education, and more, but even within so-called “developed” countries, poor and otherwise marginalized communities lack access to these necessary tools. Digital divides are also present within global South states: we have not reached Sustainable Development Goal target 9(c), to bring all those in least developed countries online by 2020. As societies’ reliance on technological interventions increases over time, these divides will deepen in significance and pose life-or-death threats to people around the world.
    5. Representative and disaggregated data is a necessary, if not sufficient, condition for racial equity in emerging digital technologies, but it must be collected and managed equitably as well.
      We welcome Special Rapporteur Achiume’s call for “States to collect, compile, analyse, disseminate and publish reliable statistical data disaggregated on racial or ethnic grounds.” However, despite important advances in data protection laws globally, adequate standards for non-extractive data collection and governance have not yet been disseminated. The history—and present—of data collection is rife with examples of the exploitation of marginalized populations, and the data that is thus taken is then generally managed in such a way that it can too often be used to further target and victimize. We would welcome, and gladly participate, in an effort to develop such standards, which should include both measures to ensure that data is truly representative and respectful, not reinforcing existing racial and other hierarchies; address the power dynamics between data collectors and those whose data is collected, including around meaningful consent; and provide safeguards to prevent such data from being used by malign actors to further oppress marginalized people.
    6. States as well as corporations must provide remedies for racial discrimination, including reparations.
      The signatories followed with interest Special Rapporteur Achiume’s previous report on the centrality of reparations in remedying the many years of socioeconomic oppression that endured during and continue after colonialism and slavery. In this report, the Special Rapporteur rightly notes that states and companies who have been involved with or overseen the development and deployment of emerging digital technologies that introduced novel instances of racial discrimination or deepened existing inequalities are obligated to participate in remedial processes and provide adequate compensation. Given the interplay between economic privilege and access to technology, as well as the rooms in which it is designed and regulated, we wish to underscore the link between these reports, and to encourage the tech giants whose record profits result at least in part from this inequality to consider acting on their public commitments to non-discrimination. This includes meaningful engagement by states and tech companies to evaluate their role in maintaining racial power structures and taking necessary steps to dismantle them.

    [1] https://onezero.medium.com/the-seductive-diversion-of-solving-bias-in-artificial-intelligence-890df5e5ef53
    [2] https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/23/17384324/meredith-broussard-artifical-unintelligence-technology-criticism-technochauvinism

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][nectar_highlighted_text color_type=”regular” highlight_color=”#ffc72c” style=”full_text”]

    Signatories

    [/nectar_highlighted_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none” shape_type=””][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” text_align=”left”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][nectar_highlighted_text color_type=”regular” style=”full_text”]

    Core Signatories

    [/nectar_highlighted_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner column_margin=”default” text_align=”left”][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” width=”1/2″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column_text]

    Access Now
    AI Now Institute
    Amnesty International
    Association for Progressive Communications
    Digital Freedom Fund
    Internet Sans Frontières
    Rashida Richardson, Visiting Scholar, Rutgers Law School (Camden); Advisory Board Member, Center for Critical Race & Digital Studies

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” column_link_target=”_self” width=”1/2″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none” shape_type=””][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][nectar_cta btn_style=”material” heading_tag=”h4″ text_color=”#ff00a5″ link_type=”new_tab” alignment=”left” display=”block” link_text=”Sign on to the Joint Civil Society Statement” url=”https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeU_Oozw_pIBf-JJHmQuj0xSHiqFTxf1ewxFKt1mOlWGGUFXg/viewform”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][nectar_highlighted_text color_type=”regular” style=”full_text”]

    Organizations

    [/nectar_highlighted_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/2″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column_text]

    7amleh – The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media
    Advocacy Initiative for Development (AID)
    AfroLeadership
    AFROTECTOPIA
    AI for the People
    American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
    Americans for Democracy & Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB)
    Amnistie internationale Canada francophone
    Asociación TEDIC
    ASUTIC Senegal
    Bangladesh NGOs Network for Radio and Communication
    BetaNYC
    Bloggers of Zambia
    Bolo Bhi
    Center for Media Studies and Peacebuilding 
    Center on Race, Inequality, and the Law at NYU School of Law
    Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria
    Centre for Information Technology and Development (CITAD)
    Centre for Multilateral Affairs (CfMA)
    CIPPIC—The Samuelson Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
    Civil Liberties Union for Europe
    Código Sur
    Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA)
    Common Cause Zambia
    Coordenação Estadual das Comunidades Quilombolas do Tocantins
    Defend Digital Me
    Derechos Digitales · América Latina
    Digital Welfare State and Human Rights Project at NYU Law
    Digital Welfare State and Human Rights Project at NYU Law
    DigitalSENSE Africa Media
    Državljan D
    ENRICH – Equity for Indigenous Research and Innovation Co-ordinating Hub
    European Center for Democracy and Human Rights (ECDHR)
    European Center For Not-Profit Law Stichting (ECNL)
    European Digital Rights (EDRi)
    Free Expression Myanmar (FEM)
    Fundación Datos Protegidos
    Fundación Huaira

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/2″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column_text]

    Fundación Karisma
    GreenNet
    Hiperderecho
    Homo Digitalis
    Hun Consultancy
    Indoensian ICT Volunteers (Relawan TIK Indonesia)
    Instituto Nupef
    Intervozes – Coletivo Brasil de Comunicação Social
    Iraqi Network for Social Media – INSM
    ITREALMS Media
    Jokkolabs Banjul
    L’Association Francophone pour les Droits de l’Homme
    Liberia Information Technology Student Union 
    Media Institute of Southern Africa-Zimbabwe
    Media Research Association (MEDAR)
    Montreal AI Ethics Institute
    Movement Alliance Project
    Open Data Manchester CIC
    OpenNet Africa
    Paradigm Initiative (PIN)
    Privacy International
    Public Knowledge
    Ranking Digital Rights
    Refugee Law Laboratory 
    Right 2 Know Campaign
    RosKomSvoboda
    Rudi International
    S.T.O.P. – The Surveillance Technology Oversight Project
    safenet
    SeguDigital
    Superrr Lab
    Thai Netizen Network
    The Initiative for Equal Rights
    Unwanted Witness Uganda
    Usuarios Digitales
    World Wide Web Foundation
    #
    #
    #

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][nectar_highlighted_text color_type=”regular” style=”full_text”]

    Individuals

    [/nectar_highlighted_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/2″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column_text]

    Karine Gentelet, Université du Québec en Outaouais
    Professor Ellen P. Goodman, Rutgers Law School
    Dr. Sarah Myers West, AI Now Institute/ Data Justice Advocate / HCI Researcher
    Dr. Stephen C. Rea, Colorado School of Mines
    Dr. Joy Lisi Rankin, AI Now Institute, New York University
    Stefaan G. Verhulst, Co-Founder, The GovLab, NYU
    Charlie Martial NGOUNOU
    Usama Khilji, Bolo Bhi
    Ahmed Ansari, NYU
    Avis MOMENI/ Civil Society actor
    damian loreti, Individual member of APC
    Jane Anderson, ENRICH and New York University
    Molly Land, Human Rights Institute, University of Connecticut
    Mariana Valente
    Meredith Broussard, New York University; author of “Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World”
    Jessica Fjeld, Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society
    Mara Mills, Associate Professor, New York University
    Ephraim Percy Kenyanito, Global Voices
    Parviz Khazaei
    Andrew Sporle, The University of Auckland, iNZight Analytics Ltd.
    Dr Monique Mann, Senior Lecturer in Criminology, Deakin University
    Gayathry Venkiteswaran, media freedom activist, Malaysia
    Sabine Poeschmann
    Kate Sim, Oxford Internet Institute
    John Lunsford
    Dr Emily Petherick Loughborough University
    Aung Zaw Min
    MUHEEB SAEED, MEDIA FOUNDATION FOR WEST AFRICA
    Daniel Kreiss, UNC Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life
    Zeerak Waseem, University of Sheffield
    Tonia Sutherland, PhD, Director SOURCE Hawaiʻi, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Advidory Board, Center for Critical Race + Digital Studies
    Janna Huang, UC Berkeley Sociology
    Lucy Bernholz, Digital Civil Society Lab, Stanford University
    Resident Fellow, Information Society Project at Yale Law School
    Vibranium Health Equity
    Leyla Gayibova, Teaching Assistant at The Hague University of Applied Sciences
    Ben Green, Harvard University
    Samuelson-Glushko Professor of Law, University of Ottawa
    University of Livingstonia, Malawi
    Juliet Nanfuka, CIPESA
    Gürkan Özturan, Journalist, Digital Rights & Liberties Analyst
    Dr. Farida Vis, Media Department, Manchester Metropolitan University (UK), Director Visual Social Media Lab, Advisory Board Member, Center for Critical Race & Digital Studies
    Dr. Simon Faulkner, Department of Art and Performance, Manchester Metropolitan University, United Kingdom
    Gaëtan Goldberg (Data Rights)
    Mariana Fossatti, APC
    Dr. Baobao Zhang, Cornell Society of Fellows; Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University
    Christelle A.
    Abebe Chekol, ICT4D Expert
    Cynthia Khoo, Research Fellow, Citizen Lab
    Rediet Abebe, Harvard Society of Fellows
    Daniel Shiffman, New York University, Tisch School of the Arts, ITP/IMA
    Lynda Osborne, M.S., Ph.D. Candidate, Educational Psychologist, Human Factors Engineer, Founder of the Consumer Tech Innovation Festival (CTIF) and the conference on AI Prospects, Perils & Commerce

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/2″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

  • New Report Published on Human Rights, Race, and Tech in collaboration with The Promise Institute for Human Rights

    [vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column_text]

    Mapping the Structural Threats

    — The following is an excerpt from the report.

    The Promise Institute for Human Rights at UCLA School of Law and the UCLA Center for Critical Internet Inquiry convened an expert working group of leading international scholars of race and technology to discuss “Human Rights, Racial Equality and Emerging Digital Technologies: Mapping the Structural Threats.”

    The in-depth discussions will inform a report by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, Tendayi Achiume, UCLA Law Professor and Promise Institute Faculty Director, to be delivered to the UN Human Rights Council on July 16, 2020.

    This report summarizes important highlights from a number of leading researchers who are experts in the specifics that inform this report, and who have written extensively at the intersection of race and technology (read the report).

    Our entire society is now technological, which has
    profound impact and implication for racial equality.

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column_text]

    Thank you to the Knight Foundation for their generous support of this work.

    [/vc_column_text]

    [/vc_column][/vc_row]

  • Article on Loss Of Public Goods To Big Tech by Dr. Safiya Noble for Noēma published by the Berggruen Institute

    Article on Loss Of Public Goods To Big Tech by Dr. Safiya Noble for Noēma published by the Berggruen Institute

    [vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column_text]

    An article written by Dr. Safiya Noble

    — The following is an excerpt from Dr. Noble’s article in Noēma.

    For decades, the titans of technology have talked about human-centered artificial intelligence and its capacity to inform and improve the future of humanity. If there was ever a moment where the overstated promises of such technologies could be put to the test, it is now.

    Much of the COVID-19 crisis response, including the disparate impact of the disease on African Americans and people who have been economically and politically abandoned, shows us the limitations, failures and potential harms of Silicon Valley promises. The consequences have been devastating. The inescapable truth is that the fragility and inequality of our social, political and economic systems have been laid bare.

    We cannot automate the tough decisions, the redistributions of power and the everyday behavior it will take to make just societies. We will not compute our way out of these crises to the better future we want (read the full article).

    We need new paradigms, not more new tech.

     

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

  • A Conversation on Algorithms and Bias

    A Conversation on Algorithms and Bias

    [vc_row type=”in_container” full_screen_row_position=”middle” column_margin=”default” scene_position=”center” text_color=”dark” text_align=”left” overlay_strength=”0.3″ shape_divider_position=”bottom” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column column_padding=”no-extra-padding” column_padding_position=”all” background_color_opacity=”1″ background_hover_color_opacity=”1″ column_link_target=”_self” column_shadow=”none” column_border_radius=”none” width=”1/1″ tablet_width_inherit=”default” tablet_text_alignment=”default” phone_text_alignment=”default” overlay_strength=”0.3″ column_border_width=”none” column_border_style=”solid” bg_image_animation=”none”][vc_column_text]

    An interview with Dr. Safiya Noble

    — The following is an excerpt from The Caret’s interview with Dr. Noble.

    In 2018, UCLA Information Studies professor Safiya Noble published her best-selling book “Algorithms of Oppression,” exposing how search engines, specifically Google, perpetuate discrimination and racism. As a result, the search engine companies paid lip service to cleaning up their acts and indeed, two years later, some thing have gotten better. (For instance, when you Google “black girls,” you are no longer served up a page of pornographic and sexually explicit websites). But as Noble points out, there’s still a long way to go. And at a time when we rely on search engines more than ever for news and information, the stakes are critically high. Below, a discussion on the state of algorithmic bias in general, Google’s transgressions in particular, and how we can help guard against a future where technology works in the service of existing prejudices and escalates social injustice (read the full interview).

    Machine learning presents itself to be fair and impartial. It is not.

     

    [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]